The OBBB Act Distributional and fiscal backdrop: headwinds for safety-net care

Written By Erika Sessions

A practical playbook for HCBS & LTSS leaders (mapped to workforce, compliance, client support, and advocacy)

The macro picture behind the One Big Beautiful Bill Act matters as much as the program rules. CBO’s score shows larger federal deficits, and its distributional analysis finds net resource losses at the bottom of the income scale—the very people most likely to rely on HCBS and other long-term supports. That combination creates friction for access, provider rates, and stability over the next decade.

What the numbers say

  • Bigger deficits mean tighter budgets later. CBO estimates the law increases the unified federal deficit by about $3.4 trillion during 2025–2034, raising debt and interest costs that typically trigger cost-containment pressure in Medicaid and Medicare down the road.

  • Resources shift away from the lowest-income households. CBO’s distributional analysis projects that households in the lowest income decile lose roughly $1,200 per year (2025 dollars) in overall resources, while middle and upper-income groups see gains—implying greater strain on safety-net providers and the families they serve.

  • Automatic cuts risk (PAYGO) is in the background. Statutory PAYGO requires across-the-board reductions if legislation increases the deficit and Congress doesn’t waive it. CBO’s PAYGO memo lays out those potential effects—even though Congress often acts to avoid them. For operators, this is a macro risk to watch, not a certainty.

  • There are offsets for rural systems—but they’re time-limited. The law creates a Rural Health Transformation Program with $10 billion per year for FY2026–FY2030—useful, but temporary.

Bottom line: Expect persistent rate pressure, tougher state financing choices, and higher coverage churn, which results in lower access to care and thus adverse health complications, interacting with these macro trends—conditions that directly affect HCBS and broader LTSS.

The results of higher coverage churn include:

  • Disrupted Care Continuity: Losing and regaining health insurance, especially frequently (churning), disrupts established patient-provider relationships and continuity of care. This means individuals might have to find new doctors, navigate new provider networks, or deal with different benefit structures, creating barriers to accessing care.

  • Delayed and Forgone Care: During periods of uninsurance, or when transitioning between plans, individuals may delay or forgo necessary medical care, including preventive services, prescribed medications, and treatment for chronic conditions.

  • Worsening Health Outcomes: The lack of consistent access to care, particularly for individuals with chronic conditions like diabetes, can lead to worsening health outcomes, increased emergency room visits, and hospitalizations for preventable conditions.

  • Increased Burden and Costs: Beyond health consequences, churn creates administrative burdens for states, health plans, and providers, notes HHS.gov. It also potentially increases healthcare costs due to a surge in demand for services after periods of being uninsured. 

In essence, stable and continuous health insurance coverage is crucial for ensuring consistent access to care, promoting preventive measures, managing chronic conditions effectively, and ultimately contributing to better health outcomes. 

What this means for your operation

1) Workforce development

Goal: Retain and upskill talent when rate growth may stall.

  • Lock in career ladders (Companion → Personal Care → Advanced Dementia/Behavioral Health aide) and tie micro-credentials (2–4 hrs) to skill-based pay differentials. This keeps growth pathways open even if across-the-board raises slow.

  • Build shared pipelines with health systems/SNFs (paid practicums, apprenticeships). If your state pursues the rural fund, position your program as a workforce partner in those proposals.

  • Cross-train for stability: short modules on documentation, respectful cost-share conversations, and dementia-informed care reduce rework and turnover—the cheapest “raise” is fewer lost shifts.

2) Compliance adherence

Goal: Stay audit-proof while protecting cash flow.

  • Map every revenue stream to its policy hook: base rates vs. managed-care add-ons, cost-sharing logic, shorter retro periods, and any state-directed-payment exposure (see our Post #6). Keep payer attestations and phase-down schedules in a single “financing binder.”

  • Tighten front-end verification (renewal calendars, address hygiene, ex parte nudges with plans). This guards against the procedural churn that CBO’s distributional picture suggests will hit lower-income clients hardest.

  • Scenario-test budget risk using CBO’s horizon (2025–2034). Stress cases: flat rates + rising labor costs; increased no-pay from missed renewals; and slower payment cycles during state belt-tightening.

3) Client support

Goal: Keep eligible people covered and reduce financial surprises.

  • Benefits-navigation as a service line. Offer plain-language, multilingual renewal kits and brief coaching on documentation for community-engagement rules; track time-to-reinstatement for erroneous closures and escalate with MCOs.

  • Small-balance tools for FY2029 cost-sharing (cap tracking to the 5% family limit; hardship workflow) reduce drop-offs when budgets are tight.

  • Warm referrals (transportation, nutrition, caregiver stress, dementia supports) stabilize households whose net resources shrink under the law’s distributional effects.

4) Advocacy

Goal: Shape state choices that protect community-based care amid fiscal pressure.

  • Rate strategy: Press for HCBS rate re-bases tied to cost-to-serve and outcomes (falls reduction, avoidable ED use) rather than temporary add-ons vulnerable to financing caps.

  • Streamlining without the federal clock: Although CMS’s enrollment-simplification rule is delayed to FY2035, push your state to adopt ex parte renewals, standardized notices, and longer response windows now to curb churn.

  • Rural fund positioning: If you serve rural areas, advocate to direct $10 billion/year (FY2026–FY2030) toward workforce pipelines, community-based stabilization (transport, respite), and technology that reduces avoidable facility use.

Talking points you can use when talking with peers and policy makers

  1. “We need predictable, cost-based HCBS rates.” With CBO showing higher deficits and lower resources at the bottom, static rates will erode access; let’s publish a rate-rebase calendar with transparent cost inputs.

  2. “Cut churn first.” Voluntary ex parte renewals, multilingual notices, and address-update protocols cost less than crisis care and keep eligible people covered—even while federal streamlining waits for 2035.

  3. “Aim the rural dollars at community capacity.” Use the FY2026–FY2030 rural fund to co-finance direct-care pipelines, caregiver respite, and transitions that lower ED visits and admissions.

Metrics to watch (and bring to payer/State check-ins)

  • Renewal success rate and time-to-reinstatement after erroneous terminations

  • Authorized-hours vs. delivered-hours (gap narrows with stable staffing and client supports)

  • Avoidable ED visit rate and 30-day readmission rate for community transitions

  • Vacancy/turnover and micro-credential completions (ties to retention)

  • Days in A/R and denials by reason (documentation vs. eligibility)

Bottom line

The distributional and fiscal backdrop to OBBB points to lean years for safety-net care: less slack in federal and state budgets and fewer resources for the people who need LTSS the most.

HCBS leaders must

(1) invest in pipelines and micro-skills,

(2) harden eligibility and billing operations,

(3) wrap clients with navigation and small-balance supports, and

(4) advocate for cost-based, community-first rate policy

These intentions and initiatives will protect access, dignity, and sustainability—no matter which way the fiscal winds blow.

References

Erika Sessions
Next

State financing tools tighten—pressure will show up in rates and “optional” services